PART 1 - Aviation ought to do more to fight global warming

Although the aviation sector accounts for just 2.8% of global greenhouse gas emissions, less and less people are willing to accept this. The industry's well-known but somehow worn-out references to technical innovations and the use of more energy-efficient engines have long since lost their power of persuasion. It is mainly low-cost airlines that are spoiling the records, by making flying ever cheaper, tapping into new customer segments and thus predominantly torpedoing the industry's collective emissions balance.

Noble commitments, but how credible are they?
Fact is, the industry has committed itself to grow without producing more net emissions as of January 1, this year. By 2050, the aviation sector promises to have halved CO2 emissions compared to the reference year 2005.

Realistic goals? Very doubtful!
In view of the industry's rather passive attitude towards increasing global warming which will presumably lead to mounting protests, more and more countries will likely demand that kerosene taxes are paid by airlines, making flying significantly more expensive. A sword of Damocles - particularly for budget carriers. 
Yet before governments impose taxes as a cudgel, digging deep into the airlines’ pockets, passengers as well as cargo players can themselves largely contribute to making CO2-neutral flying feasible: through compensation measures that neutralize CO2 emissions coupled with noticeable saving effects as illustrated in PART 2.
Heiner Siegmund

Footnote: We always welcome your comments to our articles. However, we can only publish them when the sender name is authentic