Delta Air Lines has announced that it will cease its Atlanta-Dubai service from Feb. 11, 2016 and also has cancelled its US$5 million annual membership of the U.S. airline trade group
Airlines For America (A4A).
Both decisions are intrinsically linked to its ongoing battle, together with American Airlines and United Airlines, to keep three Gulf carriers, Emirates, Etihad and Qatar, from further
expanding their networks in the U.S.
Meanwhile, Emirates has refuted Delta's excuse for Dubai exit, calling it a politically motivated step.

In a statement, the Atlanta-based carrier said the decision to end the Atlanta-Dubai Boeing 777 service was made “amid overcapacity on U.S. routes to the Middle East operated by government-owned
and heavily subsidized airlines, and less than a month after Delta reduced service between the world’s busiest airport and the Middle East’s largest hub.” The airline added that the B777 used for
Dubai flights will be “redeployed to other transatlantic markets where it can compete on a level playing field that’s not distorted by subsidized state-owned airlines.”
Unprofitable route
Delta's arguments to cease its Atlanta-Dubai service are flimsy and unconvincing at best, as they fail to mention that the U.S. carrier has had no competition from any of the three Middle East
rivals on this specific service, because none of the Gulf carriers operate from the Middle East to Atlanta.
Qatar Airways has announced plans to launch service from Doha to Atlanta from June 1, 2016, but until now Delta has had the Atlanta-Dubai route entirely to itself but, for whatever reason, has
failed to make the route profitable.
End of the road
One of the possible reasons for this failure is that Delta, nor the two other U.S. legacy carriers, can offer passengers or cargo customers the convenience of a beyond network from the Middle
East to the Indian sub-continent to destinations such as India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka, something which its Gulf rivals have heavily invested in and expanded in the past few
years and continue to do so.
The sobering fact is that Dubai literally was the end of the road for Delta. However, it has the audacity to now playing to the group of dwindling supporters of its protectionist's policies with
the Dubai pull-out decision, as well as the cancellation of its A4A membership, a body which it has accused of failing "to support Delta on several key issues, including the growing harm of
government-subsidized carriers in the Middle East.”
BTC speaks of a demonizing attempt
In a reaction, the Business Travel Coalition (BTC), which is a very vocal critic of the protectionist moves by the three U.S. legacy carriers, noted that: "Delta's (US3) war on Gulf carrier entry
into U.S. markets has now entered the operational and financial drawdown phase.
"The multi-million dollar US3 campaign to demonize the Gulf carriers was doomed from conception with tepid backing from other US airlines and zero support from consumers, corporate travel
departments and other industry stakeholders such as cargo carriers and airports adversely impacted by US airline industry consolidation."
Emirates now eyes Atlanta route
Emirates Airline has described Delta Airlines' decision to withdraw its only direct service between Atlanta and Dubai next year as "a political move to position Delta as a victim of the Gulf
carriers, which is laughable considering Delta’s size and profitability.”
The National newspaper quoted a spokeswoman for the airline as saying that: “Delta effectively has a monopoly on the Atlanta to Dubai route, because they can carry Fly America traffic that is
protected from non-US carriers, and enjoy high seat loads and yield on the route. By any airline’s standards, these are lucrative conditions and hardly reason to cease the Atlanta to Dubai
service.”
DL makes money on the Dubai route, claims EK
According to studies by Emirates, the Atlanta to Dubai route is a cash generator for Delta. In a reaction, the Gulf carrier noted: "Considering that over 55% of the traffic that Delta carried on
the route connects in Dubai to or from destinations in India, Afghanistan, Iraq, and other cities in the Gulf, it is also disingenuous for Delta to point the finger at Gulf airlines for carrying
traffic to the U.S. that does not originate in their hub city.” It added that its studies indicated that the route was a highly profitable one, with an estimated route profitability of over US$10
million a year, or a route net margin of 7%.
Tougher battle ahead
Meanwhile, the Dubai-based carrier, which currently flies to 10 points in the U.S., confirmed that it is considering adding a service between Dubai and Atlanta to its network, a move which is
likely to be fiercely resisted by the American carriers and notably by Delta, because Atlanta is its global hub.
Delta has been the most vociferous of the American critics and its chief executive, Richard Anderson is seen as the most outspoken in his criticism of the Gulf carriers. In an interview with
CNN earlier this year, he linked the Gulf carriers to the September 11 terrorist attacks in 2001. The airline later apologised for the remarks.
Nol van Fenema
Write a comment